4.7 Article

The continuous-discontinuous cellular automaton method for elastodynamic crack problems

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages 482-496

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.025

Keywords

The time domain continuous-discontinuous; cellular automaton; Cellular automaton method; Fast updating scheme; Dynamic stress intensity factor; Elastodynamic problem

Categories

Funding

  1. State Key Research Development Program of China [2017YFC0804203]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51621006, U1765206]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-DQC029]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2014304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the recently proposed continuous-discontinuous cellular automaton method (CDCA) is further developed for elastodynamic problems in 2D elastic solids. A continuity-to-discontinuity enriched function technique is developed for elastodynamics and combined with a cellular automaton formulation; the cellular automaton theory for elastodynamics, in which fast adaptive updating rules for the cell and its neighbors are developed, and the time domain CDCA are proposed. In this method, the cracks are independent of the integral meshes, and no assembled global matrix is needed for the whole process. Time-dependent equations for the cells are discretized by the Newmark method, and rapidly solved by the cellular automaton method. To analyze the fracture behaviors of elastic solids with dynamic loads, mixed-mode dynamic stress intensity factors are obtained by the interaction integral method. Some numerical examples for elastodynamic problems are studied to validate the accuracy and efficiency of the present method, and solutions from analytical method and some other methods are employed to show the high accuracy of the CDCA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available