4.7 Article

An examination of losses in energy savings after the Japanese Top Runner Program?

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 312-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.040

Keywords

Conditional demand analysis; Energy efficiency; Home appliance; Japanese Top Runner Program; Rebound effect

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan [2-1707]
  2. KAKENHI of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18H00837]
  3. Joint Usage and Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H00837] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many countries have introduced various policies to improve the energy efficiency of home appliances. Japan introduced the Top Runner Program in 1998 to set efficiency standards for major home appliances. Although the energy efficiency of home appliances significantly improved after the implementation of the program, household electricity consumption has also increased. Using micro-level data from the National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure, we conduct conditional demand analysis to show how energy savings have been lost after the Top Runner Program. We find that households began spending more electricity on space cooling and food preservation after the implementation of the program. Although electricity consumption per air conditioner (AC) has decreased, the number of ACs per household has increased. Conversely, electricity consumption per refrigerator (REF) has increased because households have started buying bigger REFs. The energy savings obtained by the Top Runner Program was lost by the size and stock increases of home appliances. If a household increases the size and stock of home appliances, then it will not be possible to reduce the household electricity consumption by simply improving the energy efficiency of appliances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available