4.7 Article

Investigation of the potential to improve DC fast charging station economics by integrating photovoltaic power generation and/or local battery energy storage system

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 246-259

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.147

Keywords

DC fast charging stations; Photovoltaic (PV); Battery energy storage system (BESS); Economic feasibility; Electrical vehicles

Funding

  1. Government of Canada's Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The economic feasibility of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations is strongly impacted by electricity charges, billed by electricity consumption (kWh) and power demand (kW), that have to be paid to the local utility. In this simulation study, the possibilities to significantly improve DCFC economics by reducing these utility charges have been investigated for DCFC stations assumed to be installed at highway service centres in Ontario and in Alberta (Canada). Various scenarios, in which the DCFCs are complemented by local photovoltaic (PV) power generation and/or a battery energy storage system (BESS), are evaluated against a reference case with only a grid connection. The discounted payback periods of the required additional capital investments have been examined. The analysis results indicate that the proposed systems are able to reduce the demand charges due to the addition of BESS and reduce the electricity consumption charges due to the utilization of PV. Although the proposed systems cannot pay themselves back within a reasonable period under the current PV and battery prices, the economic viability in a 5- to 10-year timeframe becomes quite promising considering the expected continuous decline of these prices because of technology advancement, manufacturing efficiencies and market expansions. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available