4.7 Article

Life-cycle assessment of biofuel production from microalgae via various bioenergy conversion systems

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 1033-1045

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.074

Keywords

Life-cycle assessment; Microalgae bioenergy; Energy consumption; Net energy ratio; Environmental impact; Greenhouse gas emission

Funding

  1. International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51561145013]
  2. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [51506017, 51606020]
  3. Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas and Returnees [cx2017017]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDQYDL0049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microalgae is an alternative feedstock for biofuel production and has been considered to be a potential biotechnology. However, the systems for industrial biofuel production from microalgae are still costly and unsuitable. In addition, the complex and changeable processes contained in different bioenergy conversion systems make it difficult to reasonably compare these systems. This study aim to obtain an optimal microalgae-based industrial system using life-cycle assessment, and to unify the uncertainties caused by the discrepancies of each process. Two types of bioenergy conversion systems were modelled and compared: (1) transesterification, hydrothermal liquefaction, and pyrolysis for renewable diesel production and (2) anaerobic digestion without/with hydrothermal pretreatment for biogas production. The life-cycle impacts of these systems were quantified in terms of net energy ratios (NERs) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The results show that anaerobic digestion system with hydrothermal pretreatment is more industrially feasible and eco-friendly at the industrial scale due to its low NER (0.71) and GHG emissions [-60.84 g CO2-eq (MJ biogas)(-1)]. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available