4.7 Article

Production of biochars from textile fibres through torrefaction and their characterisation

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 664-673

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.123

Keywords

Textile fibre; Biochar; Torrefaction; Energy feedstock

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [216M406]
  2. Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Turkey [16-TKUAM-002, 18-BIL-007, 17-FEN-063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the utilization of textile fibres as energy feedstock in the form of biochar was investigated depending on the fibre type. The biochars were produced from waste natural and synthetic fibres and its blends. For this purpose, different types of textile fibres (cotton, viscose, polyester, acrylic) and their blends (cotton/polyester, acrylic/wool, acrylic/polyester, acrylic/viscose) were torrefied at temperatures between 300 and 400 degrees C. The effects of torrefaction temperature and fibre type on biochar yield and biochar properties (fuel properties, morphological and structural properties and combustion characteristics) were investigated. The results showed that the temperature had a significant effect on biochar yield whereas the fibre type was the only significant factor on energy densification ratio and biochar properties. The torrefaction of tested fibres and blends resulted in an energy-intensive solid fuel, having a negligible amount of ash and sulphur. Although torrefied acrylic based textile fibres had similar H/C and O/C ratios to bituminous coal, it was concluded that high nitrogen contents will limit their usage as fuel. Overally, this study showed that torrefaction of cotton and cotton/polyester textile wastes is a promising process for the production of a solid fuel, which can be used as a substitute fuel in coal/waste co-firing systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available