4.8 Article

From low to high gear: there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of evolution

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 233-244

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13189

Keywords

Conservation biology; contemporary evolution; eco-evo dynamics; ecosystems ecology; evolution; fisheries biology; genetics of adaptation; invasive species; pest management; wildlife biology

Categories

Funding

  1. Guggenheim Foundation
  2. Keely visiting fellowship from Wadham College, Oxford University
  3. National Science Foundation of the United States [DEB-1556884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies of evolution performed in nature and the associated demonstration of rapid evolution, observable on a time scale of months to years, were an acclaimed novelty in the 1980-1990s. Contemporary evolution is now considered ordinary and is an integrated feature of many areas of research. This shift from extraordinary to ordinary reflects a change in the perception of evolution. It was formerly thought of as a historical process, perceived through the footprints left in the fossil record or living organisms. It is now seen as a contemporary process that acts in real time. Here we review how this shift occurred and its consequences for fields as diverse as wildlife management, conservation biology, and ecosystems ecology. Incorporating contemporary evolution in these fields has caused old questions to be recast, changed the answers, caused new and previously inconceivable questions to be addressed, and inspired the development of new subdisciplines. We argue further that the potential of contemporary evolution has yet to be fulfilled. Incorporating evolutionary dynamics in any research program can provide a better assessment of how and why organisms and communities came to be as they are than is attainable without an explicit treatment of these dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available