4.3 Article

Australian Indigenous Land Management, Ecological Knowledge and Languages for Conservation

Journal

ECOHEALTH
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 171-176

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-018-1380-z

Keywords

Indigenous land management; Indigenous ecological knowledge; Indigenous languages; Aboriginal Australians; Biodiversity; Disadvantage; Cross-cultural knowledge

Funding

  1. Australian Government Cooperative Research Centre Program through the Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation (CRC-REP)
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Centre for Remote Health (Flinders University)
  3. Poche Centre for Indigenous Health and Wellbeing Northern Territory, Banatjarl Strongbala Wumin Grup, Central Desert Native Title Services
  4. Miwatj Health Aboriginal Corporation
  5. Muntjiltjarra Wurrgumu Group, Northern Star Resources, Ngangganawili Aboriginal Health Service Community
  6. Wurli-Wurlinjang Health Service, Yalu Mar?githinyaraw Aboriginal Corporation
  7. Yolngu Business Enterprises
  8. Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation, through the Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  9. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many Indigenous Australians hold cultural, ecological and language knowledge, but common representations of Indigenous Australians focus on social disadvantage and poor comparisons with other Australians in education, employment and health. Indigenous Land Management works with Indigenous people's cultural, ecological and language expertise, employing Indigenous people in activities contributing to biodiversity conservation. The Interplay research surveyed 841 Indigenous people in remote communities. Those employed in land management reported greater participation in cultural activities, language knowledge, and belief that their land was looked after. These related assets provide an opportunity for policy approaches based on Indigenous people's strengths and contribution to Australia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available