4.5 Article

The effect of a small vegetation dieback event on salt marsh sediment transport

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 944-952

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4547

Keywords

dieback; sediment transport; salt marsh; erosion; vegetation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1529245, 1654374, 1426981, 1237733]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  3. US Geological Survey (USGS) Climate and Land Use Research and Development program
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1529245] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1426981] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetation is a critical component of the ecogeomorphic feedbacks that allow a salt marsh to build soil and accrete vertically. Vegetation dieback can therefore have detrimental effects on marsh stability, especially under conditions of rising sea levels. Here, we report a variety of sediment transport measurements associated with an unexpected, natural dieback in a rapidly prograding marsh in the Altamaha River Estuary, Georgia. We find that vegetation mortality led to a significant loss in elevation at the dieback site as evidenced by measurements of vertical accretion, erosion, and surface topography compared to vegetated reference areas. Below-ground vegetation mortality led to reduced soil shear strength. The dieback site displayed an erosional, concave-up topographic profile, in contrast to the reference sites. At the location directly impacted by the dieback, there was a reduction in flood dominance of suspended sediment concentration. Our work illustrates how a vegetation disturbance can at least temporarily reverse the local trajectory of a prograding marsh and produce complex patterns of sediment transport. (c) 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available