4.4 Article

Incentive Mechanism of R&D Firms' Collaborative Innovation Based on Organisational Ambidexterity

Journal

DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY
Volume 2019, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6750123

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFB1401400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71302021]
  3. Humanities and Social Sciences projects of the Ministry of Education of China [17YJA630086]
  4. program of China Scholarships Council (CSC) [201508515045]
  5. Management Science and Engineering Construction Funds of Southwest Minzu University [2018-XWD-S1201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From the perspective of organizational ambidexterity, we consider the choice of innovation strategy among R&D firms. By building on contractual arrangements and employing a dynamic game model, we focus on the incentive mechanism of R&D Firms' collaborative innovation and analyze incentive contracts of benefits distribution and cost-sharing when two firms conduct market-driven innovation (exploitative innovation) strategy and technological research-driven innovation (exploratory innovation) strategy respectively, and collaborate for innovation with each other. We also discuss the influence of exploratory and exploitative innovation effects on decision-making of R&D firms regarding whether to choose collaborative innovation under different incentive contracts. The results show that the effects of exploratory innovation acts as the intrinsic motivation of collaborative innovation while exploratory innovation could be improved to some degree by exploitative innovation. In addition, both investment levels of exploratory and exploitative innovation would decrease (increase) when innovation cost (innovative efficiency) increases. Moreover, compared with a benefit-distribution contract, cost-sharing contracts would not only lead exploitative innovation to realize optimal revenue, but also provide incentives for exploratory innovation more effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available