4.7 Article

Glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A multicentre randomized clinical trial

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 837-843

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13587

Keywords

DPP-IV inhibitor; glycaemic control; incretin therapy; randomised trial

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim, Atlanta
  2. Public Health Service Grant from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program [UL1 RR025008, UL1 TR001082]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1P30DK111024-01]
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. National Center for Research Resources [1P30DK111024-01UL1 TR001082UL1RR025008]
  6. Colorado CTSA
  7. [K12HD085850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The use of incretin-based therapy, rather than or complementary to, insulin therapy is an active area of research in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We determined the glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized surgical patients with T2D. Materials and Methods This prospective open-label multicentre study randomized T2D patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with admission blood glucose (BG) of 7.8 to 22.2 mmol/L who were under treatment with diet, oral agents or total insulin dose (TDD) <= 0.5 units/kg/day to either linagliptin (n = 128) daily or basal-bolus (n = 122) with glargine once daily and rapid-acting insulin before meals. Both groups received supplemental insulin for BG > 7.8 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was difference in mean daily BG between groups. Results Mean daily BG was higher in the linagliptin group compared to the basal-bolus group (9.5 +/- 2.6 vs 8.8 +/- 2.3 mmol/L/dL, P = 0.03) with a mean daily BG difference of 0.6 mmol/L (95% confidence interval 0.04, 1.2). In patients with randomization BG < 11.1 mmol/L (63% of cohort), mean daily BG was similar in the linagliptin and basal-bolus groups (8.9 +/- 2.3 vs 8.7 +/- 2.3 mmol/L, P = 0.43); however, patients with BG >= 11.1 mmol/L who were treated with linagliptin had higher BG compared to the basal-bolus group (10.9 +/- 2.6 vs 9.2 +/- 2.2 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Linagliptin resulted in fewer hypoglycaemic events (1.6% vs 11%, P = 0.001; 86% relative risk reduction), with similar supplemental insulin and fewer daily insulin injections (2.0 +/- 3.3 vs 3.1 +/- 3.3, P < 0.001) compared to the basal-bolus group. Conclusions For patients with T2D undergoing non-cardiac surgery who presented with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia (BG < 11.1 mmol/L), daily linagliptin is a safe and effective alternative to multi-dose insulin therapy, resulting in similar glucose control with lower hypoglycaemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available