4.5 Article

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy: progress in manufacturing and assessments of potency

Journal

CYTOTHERAPY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 289-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.10.014

Keywords

bioreactors; cell; and tissue-based therapy; mesenchymal stromal cells; quality control

Funding

  1. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  2. Arthritis Society [TGP-18-0206]
  3. Celtic Advanced Lifescience Innovation Network (CALIN) studentship [80885]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stromal cell ( MSC) therapies have been pursued for a broad spectrum of indications but mixed reports on clinical efficacy have given rise to some degree of skepticism regarding the effectiveness of this approach. However, recent reports of successful clinical outcomes and regulatory approvals for graft- versus- host disease, Crohn's disease and critical limb ischemia have prompted a shift in this perspective. With hundreds of clinical trials involving MSCs currently underway and an increasing demand for large- scale manufacturing protocols, there is a critical need to develop standards that can be applied to processing methods and to establish consensus assays for both MSC processing control and MSC product release. Reference materials and validated, uniformly applied tests for quality control of MSC products are needed. Here, we review recent developments in MSC manufacturing technologies, release testing and potency assays. We conclude that, although MSCs hold considerable promise clinically, economies of scale have yet to be achieved although numerous bioreactor technologies for scalable production of MSCs exist. Additionally, rigorous disease- specific product testing and comprehensive understanding of mechanisms of action, which are linked to relevant process and product release potency assays, will be required to ensure that these therapies continue to be successful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available