4.1 Article

Hypermethylation of Secreted Frizzled Related Protein 1 gene promoter in different astrocytoma grades

Journal

CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 213-223

Publisher

MEDICINSKA NAKLADA
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2018.59.213

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [6625]
  2. CoRE - Neuro European Regional Development Fund, Operational Programme Competitiveness and Cohesion [KK.01.1.1.01.0007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To identify the involvement of Secreted Frizzled Related Protein 1 (SFRP1) promoter (hypermethylation in different malignancy grades of astrocytorn) and assess its association with beta-catenin, lymphoid-enhancer factor 1, and T-cell factor 1. Methods Twenty-six astrocytoma samples were collected from 2008-2015. Promoter hypermethylation was evaluated by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction and protein expression by immunohistochemistry and stereo logical analysis. The staining intensity was scored by comparing immunoreactivity with normal tissue and by using 10% and 50% cut-offs. Results SFRP1 promoter methylation was found in 32% of astrocytomas. The number of hypermethylated samples increased in higher astrocytoma grades and was the highest in glioblastoma (P = 0 .042 compared to other astrocytoma grades). There was 45.8% of samples with the lack of or weak expression of SFRP1 protein and 292% with strong expression. Samples with methylated promoter expressed significantly less SFRP1 than samples with unmethylated promoter (P=0.031). Beta-catenin expression levels were elevated. Yet, glioblastomas with unmethylated SFRP1 promoter had significantly less beta-catenin (P = 0.033). Strong expression of lymphoid-enhancer factor 1 was associated to higher astrocytoma grades (P=0.006). Conclusion SFRP1 gene was epigenetically silenced in glioblastomas when compared to low astrocytoma grades, which may suggest that the lack of its protein is involved in astrocytoma progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available