4.6 Article

Simultaneous-count models to estimate abundance from counts of unmarked individuals with imperfect detection

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 697-708

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13261

Keywords

Bayesian; detectability; dynamics; Gyps; hierarchical model; monitoring; N-mixture model; population; Sarcogyps; vulture

Funding

  1. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions [CE1101014]
  2. Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed a method to estimate population abundance from simultaneous counts of unmarked individuals over multiple sites. We considered that at each sampling occasion, individuals in a population could be detected at 1 of the survey sites or remain undetected and used either multinomial or binomial simultaneous-count models to estimate abundance, the latter being equivalent to an N-mixture model with one site. We tested model performance with simulations over a range of detection probabilities, population sizes, growth rates, number of years, sampling occasions, and sites. We then applied our method to 3 critically endangered vulture species in Cambodia to demonstrate the real-world applicability of the model and to provide the first abundance estimates for these species in Cambodia. Our new approach works best when existing methods are expected to perform poorly (i.e., few sites and large variation in abundance among sites) and if individuals may move among sites between sampling occasions. The approach performed better when there were >8 sampling occasions and net probability of detection was high (>0.5). We believe our approach will be useful in particular for simultaneous surveys at aggregation sites, such as roosts. The method complements existing approaches for estimating abundance of unmarked individuals and is the first method designed specifically for simultaneous counts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available