4.6 Article

Getting to know low-light images with the Exclusively Dark dataset

Journal

COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 30-42

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme through the Ministry of Education Malaysia [FRGS/1/2018/ICT02/UM/02/2]
  2. Postgraduate Research Fund through the University of Malaya [PG002-2016A]
  3. NVIDIA Corporation (United States)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-light is an inescapable element of our daily surroundings that greatly affects the efficiency of our vision. Research works on low-light imagery have seen a steady growth, particularly in the field of image enhancement, but there is still a lack of a go-to database as a benchmark. Besides, research fields that may assist us in low light environments, such as object detection, has glossed over this aspect even though breakthroughs-after breakthroughs had been achieved in recent years, most noticeably from the lack of low-light data (less than 2% of the total images) in successful public benchmark datasets such as PASCAL VOC, ImageNet, and Microsoft COCO. Thus, we propose the Exclusively Dark dataset to elevate this data drought. It consists exclusively of low-light images captured in visible light only, with image and object level annotations. Moreover, we share insightful findings in regards to the effects of low-light on the object detection task by analyzing the visualizations of both hand-crafted and learned features. We found that the effects of low-light reach far deeper into the features than can be solved by simple illumination invariance. It is our hope that this analysis and the Exclusively Dark dataset can encourage the growth in low-light domain researches on different fields. The dataset can be downloaded at https://github.com/cs-chan/Exclusively-Dark-Image-Dataset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available