4.5 Article

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: are STRATE and BLEED scores valid in clinical practice?

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 357-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.14529

Keywords

gastrointestinal bleeding; risk factors; severity scores

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) is a common gastroenterological emergency. Despite this, outcomes are difficult to predict. Only STRATE and BLEED scores are readily available. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for severe ALGIB and access the validity of available scores. Methods Emergency consecutive admissions for ALGIB in the last 7 years were retrospectively reviewed. Severe ALGIB was defined as transfusion of >= 2 units of blood and/or a haematocrit decrease of >= 20% within the first 24 h and/or recurrent bleeding after 24 h of stability. STRATE and BLEED scores were calculated and concordance between score and respective severity outcome was accessed. Results A total of 132 patients were identified. Bleeding presented as haematochezia in 94.7% and was severe in 36.4% of cases. ALGIB was significantly more severe in patients with lower systolic (P = 0.02) and diastolic blood pressures on admission (P < 0.01), lower admission haemoglobin (P < 0.01), diverticular bleeding (P < 0.01), angioectasias (P = 0.02) and radiation colitis (P < 0.02). Severe ALGIB was associated with admission intermediate care units (P < 0.01), increased length of stay (P < 0.01) and volume of blood transfused (P < 0.01). We identified no significant association between outcomes with either the STRATE (P = 0.72) or BLEED scores (P = 0.05). Conclusions Severe ALGIB is associated with greater length of stay, volume of blood transfusions and admission to greater level of care units. In our cohort, STRATE and BLEED scores were poor predictors of outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available