4.5 Article

Sinus augmentation analysis of the gradient of graft consolidation: a split-mouth histomorphometric study

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 3397-3406

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2793-3

Keywords

Biomaterials; Sinus floor elevation; Bone substitute; Native bone; Gradient

Funding

  1. Gerald A. Niznick Chair of Implantology at Tel-Aviv University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to histomorphometrically test the hypothesis that graft consolidation originates from the sinus floor.Materials and methodsThis prospective, randomized split-mouth study investigated patients undergoing bilateral maxillary lateral sinus floor augmentation using either freeze-dried bone allografts (FDBAs) or biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) bone substitute. Apico-coronal core biopsies were harvested during implant placement 9months after sinus floor augmentation, processed for histological observation, and measured histomorphometrically.ResultsBiopsies were taken from 26 bilateral sites in 13 patients. The density of new bone (NB) decreased with increasing distance from the sinus floor. The percentage mean surface of NB ranged from 319.5% at 2mm from the sinus floor (G1) to 27.711.2% at 4mm (G2) for the FDBA specimens and from 30.0 +/- 11.0% at G1 to 23.5 +/- 9.9% at G2 for the BCP specimens. Evaluation of the residual graft particle (GP) area alone as a function of distance from the floor revealed a clear inverse gradient of 7.1 +/- 6.6 to 9.1 +/- 10.3 between G1 and G2 for the FDBA allografts, with the same tendency for the BCP alloplasts (21.9 +/- 9.9 to 27.7 +/- 6.6, respectively).Conclusion Our results support the concept that osteogenesis initiates in regions proximal to the bony walls of the maxillary sinus and may be enhanced by them.Clinical relevance The nature of the grafting material had a greater influence on the degree of NB formation in regions distant from the native walls where there is reduced inherent osteogenic potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available