4.6 Review

Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages 802-844

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.001

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Electroencephalography (EEG); TMS-EEG; Biomarker; Clinical populations; Treatment

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has emerged as a powerful tool to non-invasively probe brain circuits in humans, allowing for the assessment of several cortical properties such as excitability and connectivity. Over the past decade, this technique has been applied to various clinical populations, enabling the characterization and development of potential TMS-EEG predictors and markers of treatments and of the pathophysiology of brain disorders. The objective of this article is to present a comprehensive review of studies that have used TMS-EEG in clinical populations and to discuss potential clinical applications. To provide a technical and theoretical framework, we first give an overview of TMS-EEG methodology and discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the use of TMS-EEG to assess excitability, inhibition, plasticity and connectivity following neuromodulatory techniques in the healthy brain. We then review the insights afforded by TMS-EEG into the pathophysiology and predictors of treatment response in psychiatric and neurological conditions, before presenting recommendations for how to address some of the salient challenges faced in clinical TMS-EEG research. Finally, we conclude by presenting future directions in line with the tremendous potential of TMS-EEG as a clinical tool. (C) 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available