4.7 Article

Genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST16 producing NDM-1, CTX-M-15, and OXA-232

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.004

Keywords

Antimicrobial resistance; Carbapenemase; Healthcare-associated infections; IncF; Outbreak

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health of Italy [RF-2011-02346987]
  2. Fondo ricerca e giovani 2017 of the University of Pavia
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Subprograma Estatal de Movilidad, MAES [MV17/00046]
  4. Sara Borrell contract [CD15/00017]
  5. FAPESP [2017/16754-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Genomic characterization of the internationally spread sequence type (ST) 16 carbapenemresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Methods: The complete genomes of three carbapenem producing ST16 K. pneumoniae from Italian patients were analysed by single-nucleotide polymorphism-based phylogeny, core genome multilocus sequence typing, resistance, plasmid, and virulence content and compared with ten genomes of ST16 strains isolated in other countries. Plasmids carrying blaNDM-1 or blaOXA-232 carbapenemase genes were assembled and sequences were analysed. Results: The internationally spread ST16 K. pneumoniae clone showed variability in terms of distribution of NDM-1 and OXA-232 type carbapenemases. In some ST16 strains, up to six plasmids can be simultaneously present in the same cell, including ColE-like plasmids carrying blaOXA-232 and IncF plasmids carrying blaNDM-1. The differences observed in plasmid, resistance, and virulence content and core genome suggested that there is not a unique, highly conserved ST16 clone, but instead different variants of this lineage circulate worldwide. Conclusions: The ST16 K. pneumoniae clone has spread worldwide and may become a high-risk clone. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available