4.7 Article

The hypervirulent Coxiella burnetii Guiana strain compared in silico, in vitro and in vivo to the Nine Mile and the German strain

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.039

Keywords

Q fever; Coxiella burnetii; Guiana; German; Netherlands; Outbreak; In silico; In vitro; In vivo; Virulence; Serology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Q fever epidemic outbreaks have been reported in French Guiana and in The Netherlands. To determine whether the C. burnetii strains involved in these epidemics had a peculiar virulence pattern, we compared the pathogenicity of the Guiana and the German strain (a clone of The Netherlands strain), in silico, in vitro, and in vivo versus the Nine Mile strain. Method: The pan-genomes of the Guiana (Cb175), German (Z3055), and the referent Nine Mile (RSA 493) C. burnetii strains were compared. In vitro, the growth rate and the morphological presentation were compared. In vivo (SCID and Balb/c mice), weight loss, histological lesions, C. burnetii bacterial load in deep organs, and serological response were reported according to each C. burnetii strain studied. Results: The Guiana strain had 77 times more missing genes and 12 times more unique genes than the German strain. The Guiana strain presented as large cell variants (LCVs) and led to the most pronounced fatality rate in SCID mice (100% at 4 weeks). The German strain presented as small cell variants (SCVs), and had an intermediate fatality rate (75% at 4 weeks). Both the Guiana and the German strains led to a significant higher serological response at 2 and 4 weeks post infection (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Guiana strain was the most virulent strain, followed by the German strain and the referent Nine Mile strain. Unique and missing genes could be implicated but further investigations are necessary to specify their role. (C) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available