4.7 Article

Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Trials for COMparing Personalized Antibiotic StrategieS (SMART-COMPASS)

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 1961-1967

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy912

Keywords

strategy; sequential randomization; pragmatic trial

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [UM1AI104681]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patient management is not based on a single decision. Rather, it is dynamic: based on a sequence of decisions, with therapeutic adjustments made over time. Adjustments are personalized: tailored to individual patients as new information becomes available. However, strategies allowing for such adjustments are infrequently studied. Traditional antibiotic trials are often nonpragmatic, comparing drugs for definitive therapy when drug susceptibilities are known. COMparing Personalized Antibiotic StrategieS (COMPASS) is a trial design that compares strategies consistent with clinical practice. Strategies are decision rules that guide empiric and definitive therapy decisions. Sequential, multiple-assignment, randomized (SMART) COMPASS allows evaluation when there are multiple, definitive therapy options. SMART COMPASS is pragmatic, mirroring clinical, antibiotic-treatment decision-making and addressing the most relevant issue for treating patients: identification of the patient-management strategy that optimizes the ultimate patient outcomes. SMART COMPASS is valuable in the setting of antibiotic resistance, when therapeutic adjustments may be necessary due to resistance. Patient management is dynamic, with adjustments to therapy made as new information arises. Evaluating those strategies of patient treatment allowing for therapeutic adjustments is relevant for clinical practice. SMART COMPASS is an approach to clinical trials that evaluates clinical strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available