4.7 Article

Experimental and modeling study on effects of N2 and CO2 on ignition characteristics of methane/air mixture

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 189-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.01.003

Keywords

Gas explosion; Ignition delay; Chemical shock tube; Simulation; Sensitivity analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ignition delay times of methane/air mixture diluted by N-2 and CO2 were experimentally measured in a chemical shock tube. The experiments were performed over the temperature range of 1300-2100 K, pressure range of 0.1-1.0 MPa, equivalence ratio range of 0.5-2.0 and for the dilution coefficients of 0%, 20% and 50%. The results suggest that a linear relationship exists between the reciprocal of temperature and the logarithm of the ignition delay times. Meanwhile, with ignition temperature and pressure increasing, the measured ignition delay times of methane/air mixture are decreasing. Furthermore, an increase in the dilution coefficient of N-2 or CO2 results in increasing ignition delays and the inhibition effect of CO2 on methane/air mixture ignition is stronger than that of N-2. Simulated ignition delays of methane/air mixture using three kinetic models were compared to the experimental data. Results show that GRI_3.0 mechanism gives the best prediction on ignition delays of methane/air mixture and it was selected to identify the effects of N-2 and CO2 on ignition delays and the key elementary reactions in the ignition chemistry of methane/air mixture. Comparisons of the calculated ignition delays with the experimental data of methane/air mixture diluted by N-2 and CO2 show excellent agreement, and sensitivity coefficients of chain branching reactions which promote mixture ignition decrease with increasing dilution coefficient of N-2 or CO2. (C) 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available