4.1 Article

Lack of association of cranial lacunae with intracranial hypertension in children with Crouzon syndrome and Apert syndrome: a 3D morphometric quantitative analysis

Journal

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 501-507

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04059-6

Keywords

Apert; Crouzon; Intracranial pressure; 3D morphometric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeCranial lacunae (foci of attenuated calvarial bone) are CT equivalents of copper beating seen on plain skull radiographs in children with craniosynostosis. The qualitative presence of copper beating has not been found to be useful for the diagnosis of intracranial hypertension (IH) in these patients. 3D morphometric analysis (3DMA) allows a more systematic and quantitative assessment of calvarial attenuation. We used 3DMA to examine the relationship between cranial lacunae and IH in children with Crouzon and Apert syndromic craniosynostosis.MethodsPatients were divided into IH and non-IH groups defined on an intention-to-treat basis. Pre-operative CT scans were converted into 3D skull models and processed to quantify lacunae as a percentage of calvarium surface area (LCP). This was done on individual bone and whole skull basis.ResultsEighteen consecutive children with Crouzon's syndrome and 17 with Apert syndrome were identified. Median age at CT scan was 135days (range 6-1778). Of the 35 children, 21 required surgery for IH at median age of 364days (range 38-1710). Of these 21 children, 14 had lacunae with mean LCP of 3% (0-28%). Of the 14 non-IH children, 8 had lacunae with mean LCP of 2% (0-8%). LCP was not significantly different between IH and non-IH groups. Parietal bones were most likely to show lacunae (IH 14/21, non-IH 9/14), followed by occipital (IH 8/21, non-IH 3/14), and frontal (IH 6/21, non-IH 2/14).ConclusionResults suggest that cranial lacunae, measured using quantitative 3DMA, do not correlate with IH, in agreement with evidence from qualitative plain skull radiograph studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available