4.7 Article

A genome-wide IR-induced RAD51 foci RNAi screen identifies CDC73 involved in chromatin remodeling for DNA repair

Journal

CELL DISCOVERY
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/celldisc.2015.34

Keywords

genome-wide siRNA screen; RAD51; homologous recombination; tumor suppressor; CDC73; Parafibromin; DNA repair; chromatin remodeling

Categories

Funding

  1. Torsten and Ragnar Soderberg Foundation
  2. European Research Council
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Cancer Society
  5. AXA Research Fund
  6. Swedish Pain Relief Foundation
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  8. Dutch Cancer Society
  9. EMBO LTF
  10. BBSRC [BB/K019597/1]
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K019597/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify new regulators of homologous recombination repair, we carried out a genome-wide short-interfering RNA screen combined with ionizing irradiation using RAD51 foci formation as readout. All candidates were confirmed by independent short-interfering RNAs and validated in secondary assays like recombination repair activity and RPA foci formation. Network analysis of the top modifiers identified gene clusters involved in recombination repair as well as components of the ribosome, the proteasome and the spliceosome, which are known to be required for effective DNA repair. We identified and characterized the RNA polymerase II-associated protein CDC73/Parafibromin as a new player in recombination repair and show that it is critical for genomic stability. CDC73 interacts with components of the SCF/Cullin and INO80/NuA4 chromatin-remodeling complexes to promote Histone ubiquitination. Our findings indicate that CDC73 is involved in local chromatin decondensation at sites of DNA damage to promote DNA repair. This function of CDC73 is related to but independent of its role in transcriptional elongation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available