Journal
CELLS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 21-39Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells4010021
Keywords
ELISPOT; Smart Count (TM); Log Normal distribution; harmonization
Categories
Funding
- Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF14OC0012533, NNF12OC0002037] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The primary goal of immune monitoring with ELISPOT is to measure the number of T cells, specific for any antigen, accurately and reproducibly between different laboratories. In ELISPOT assays, antigen-specific T cells secrete cytokines, forming spots of different sizes on a membrane with variable background intensities. Due to the subjective nature of judging maximal and minimal spot sizes, different investigators come up with different numbers. This study aims to determine whether statistics-based, automated size-gating can harmonize the number of spot counts calculated between different laboratories. We plated PBMC at four different concentrations, 24 replicates each, in an IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay with HCMV pp65 antigen. The ELISPOT plate, and an image file of the plate was counted in nine different laboratories using ImmunoSpot (R) Analyzers by (A) Basic Count T relying on subjective counting parameters set by the respective investigators and (B) SmartCount (TM), an automated counting protocol by the ImmunoSpot (R) Software that uses statistics-based spot size auto-gating with spot intensity auto-thresholding. The average coefficient of variation (CV) for the mean values between independent laboratories was 26.7% when counting with Basic Count (TM), and 6.7% when counting with SmartCount (TM). Our data indicates that SmartCount (TM) allows harmonization of counting ELISPOT results between different laboratories and investigators.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available