4.6 Article

Acetic Anhydride as an Oxygen Donor in the Non-Hydrolytic Sol-Gel Synthesis of Mesoporous TiO2 with High Electrochemical Lithium Storage Performances

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages 4767-4774

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201806073

Keywords

anatase; lithium-ion batteries; mesoporous materials; nanoparticles; sol-gel processes

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-16-CE08-0015 SYNCOPE]
  2. European Commission (POROUS4APP) [666157]
  3. University of Montpellier
  4. CNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An original, halide-free non-hydrolytic sol-gel route to mesoporous anatase TiO2 with hierarchical porosity and high specific surface area is reported. This route is based on the reaction at 200 degrees C of titanium(IV) isopropoxide with acetic anhydride, in the absence of a catalyst or solvent. NMR spectroscopic studies indicate that this method provides an efficient, truly non-hydrolytic and aprotic route to TiO2. Formation of the oxide involves successive acetoxylation and condensation reactions, both with ester elimination. The resulting TiO2 materials were nanocrystalline, even before calcination. Small (about 10 nm) anatase nanocrystals spontaneously aggregated to form mesoporous micron- sized particles with high specific surface area (240 m(2) g(-1) before calcination). Evaluation of the lithium storage performances shows a high reversible specific capacity, particularly for the non-calcined sample with the highest specific surface area favouring pseudo-capacitive storage: 253 mAh g(-1 )at 0.1 C and 218 mAhg(-1) at 1 C (C= 336 mA g(-1)). This sample also shows good cyclability (92% retention after 200 cycles at 336 mA g(-1)) with a high coulombic efficiency (99.8%). Synthesis in the presence of a solvent (toluene or squalane) offers the possibility to tune the morphology and texture of the TiO2 nanomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available