4.8 Article

Tuning the Electronic Structure of NiO via Li Doping for the Fast Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 419-428

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03776

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Thousand Youth Talents Program
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5171060]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT160100207]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT160100207] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal oxides are being actively pursued as low-cost electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in many electrochemical energy devices. A fundamental understanding of the oxide electronic structures, along with the ability to rationally tune them, is a key step toward designing of highly active catalysts. Here, we report the tuning of the electronic structure of NiO via Li doping (LixNi1-xO) to enhance the OER activities. We identified that Li0.5Ni0.5O (LiNiO2) has the highest OER activity, comparable to or exceeding that of the benchmark perovskite Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta and LaNiO3. More importantly, a synergistic combination of synchrotron-based photoemission spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and density functional theory was used to unravel the electronic structure of LixNi1-xO with unprecedented accuracy, thus providing deep insight into the origin of the enhanced catalytic activity. The results unambiguously reveal the creation of a new hole state at 1.1 eV above the Fermi level and an enhanced degree of O 2p-Ni 3d hybridization induced by Li doping optimize the adsorption energetics of OH intermediates and thereby facilitate the fast kinetics for the OER. The LixNi1-xO would serve as a new platform to study the relationship of composition-electronic structure-activity for OER electrocatalysts, beyond the extensively studied Co-based perovskites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available