4.8 Article

Fabrication of One- and Two-Dimensional Gold Nanoparticle Arrays on Computationally Designed Self-Assembled Peptide Templates

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 23, Pages 8510-8520

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03206

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF DMREF (Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future) program [DMR-1234161, DMR-1235084]
  2. Penn Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter [NSF DMR-1720530]
  3. NSF [ACI-1053575, TG-CHE110041, CHE1213728, CHE1709518]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 EB006006]
  5. UD COBRE NIH-COBRE [1P30 GM110758]
  6. NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce [370NANB17H302]
  7. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce
  8. National Science Foundation [DMR-0944772]
  9. INBRE [P20 GM103446]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Templating methods, combined with colloidal chemistry synthesis, provide a strategy to fabricate inorganic nanomaterials with controllable architectures. Computationally designed peptide assemblies allow fine control of templated nanomaterial architecture and morphology. Computationally designed peptide sequences, which can self-assemble into peptide nanotubes and peptide platelets, are modified with cysteine amino acids for the purpose of gold nanoparticle templating. The resulting gold nanoparticles exhibit clear one-dimensional and two-dimensional interparticle organizations due to the templating effect of the peptide assemblies. The self-assembly of the computationally designed peptides proceeds via controlled, kinetic pathways that allow manipulation of final peptide assembly nanostructure. As a result of the assembly process, the peptides in different assembled states can be used to control the organization of gold nanoparticles. This work demonstrates a new use of computationally designed peptide assemblies for inorganic nanomaterials construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available