4.6 Article

ZnO Nanoclusters Supported on Dealuminated Zeolite β as a Novel Catalyst for Direct Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 868-877

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801708

Keywords

active sites; dealuminated zeolite beta; propane dehydrogenation; propylene; ZnO

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21421001, 21573115]
  2. 111 project [B12015]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [63185015]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2017-K13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small ZnO nanoclusters supported on dealuminated zeolite were prepared and evaluated for catalyzing direct dehydrogenation of propane to propylene (PDH), exhibiting high catalytic performance. N-2 sorption, XRD, TEM, Al-27 and Si-28 MAS NMR, IR, XRF, DR UV-vis, XPS, and NH3-TPD techniques were employed to characterize the physicochemical properties of this novel catalyst system. It is found that the Zn species can be accommodated in the vacant T-atom sites of dealuminated zeolite due to the reaction of aqueous zinc acetate solution with silanol groups, and thus, producing massive small ZnO nanoclusters as active phases in PDH. Additionally, dealuminated zeolite can greatly depress side reactions attributable to the absence of strong acid sites, thereby guaranteeing high catalytic activity, propylene selectivity and stability. As a result, the optimal catalyst of 10wt% Zn loaded on dealuminated zeolite exhibits a high initial propane conversion of around 53% and a superior propylene selectivity of about 93% at a space velocity of 4000cm(3)g(cat)(-1)h(-1), together with the high stability and satisfactory reusability. This study may open a new way to design and synthesize highly active PDH catalysts with high selectivity and stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available