4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution, densification behavior and mechanical properties of nano-HfB2 sintered under high pressure

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 7885-7893

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.099

Keywords

Hafnium diboride; Nanostructured; High pressure and high temperature; Microstructure evolution; Mechanical behavior; Activation energy

Funding

  1. Graduate Student's Research and Innovation Fund of Sichuan University [2018YJSY4063]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1332104, 11604175, 51472171, 11427810]
  3. Scientific Instrumentation Fund of Chinese Academy of Sciences [U1332104]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0305900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of pure HfB2 ceramics have been prepared by sintering nano-grained powder using high-energy ball milling at 700-1600 degrees C and 5.5 GPa. The HfB2 ceramics are characterized via various techniques for their residual stress, grain size, density, microstructures and defects, hardness, fracture toughness, thermal stability, and oxidation resistance. All properties strongly depend on the treatment temperature, but the exact manner of dependence for each property varies. The results identified that the HfB2 ceramic sintered at a relatively low temperature of 1000 degrees C and 5.5 GPa a bulk pure nano-grained composite for the first time - has the best overall performance. It has a relative density of 99.6%, a Vickers hardness of 26 GPa, a fracture toughness of 5.2 MPa m(1/2), and excellent thermal stability and oxidation resistance at high temperatures. Additional strengthening and stabilizing effects are provided by microstructures and defects such as large-angle grain boundaries, stacking faults and twinning. Simultaneous high temperature and high pressure is an effective sintering route for HfB2 ceramics with grain-size ranging from nanometer to micron.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available