4.8 Review

Carbotoxicity-Noxious Effects of Carbohydrates

Journal

CELL
Volume 175, Issue 3, Pages 605-614

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ligue contre le Cancer
  2. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  4. Chancelerie des universites de Paris (Legs Poix)
  5. European Commission (ArtForce)
  6. European Research Area Network on Cardiovascular Diseases (ERA-CVD, MINOTAUR)
  7. Fondation Carrefour
  8. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  9. Inserm (HTE)
  10. LeDucq Foundation
  11. LabEx Immuno-Oncology
  12. RHU Torino Lumiere
  13. Seerave Foundation
  14. SIRICs SOCRATE
  15. CARPEM
  16. European Research Council (DeAge)
  17. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ciberonc)
  18. Progeria Research Foundation
  19. Austrian Science Fund FWF (Austria) [P23490-B20, P29262, P24381, P29203, P27893]
  20. DKplus Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases [W1226]
  21. Bundesministerium fur Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft
  22. Karl-Franzens University
  23. NAWI Graz
  24. Bio-TechMed-Graz flagship project EPIAge
  25. National Institute on Aging, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern nutrition is often characterized by the excessive intake of different types of carbohydrates ranging from digestible polysaccharides to refined sugars that collectively mediate noxious effects on human health, a phenomenon that we refer to as carbotoxicity.'' Epidemiological and experimental evidence combined with clinical intervention trials underscore the negative impact of excessive carbohydrate uptake, as well as the beneficial effects of reducing carbs in the diet. We discuss the molecular, cellular, and neuroendocrine mechanisms that link exaggerated carbohydrate intake to disease and accelerated aging as we outline dietary and pharmacologic strategies to combat carbotoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available