4.7 Article

Formation of NO+ and its possible roles during the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 on Cu-CHA catalysts

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages 61-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.12.022

Keywords

Zeolite supported Cu catalysts; Cu-CHA catalysts; Selective catalytic reduction of NOx; NO+ formation; Surface NO adsorption complexes

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  2. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. Johnson Matthey
  4. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The catalytic activities of small-pore Cu-CHA and large-pore Cu-BEA catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 were measured at a very high flow rate. Cu-CHA clearly exhibited much higher intrinsic SCR activity and lower N2O selectivity. In situ DRIFT spectra were recorded during the adsorption and desorption following NO and (NO + O-2) exposure to fully oxidized samples in a flow cell. The results are in agreement with what we have reported previously based on in situ transmission IR studies of partially reduced samples. Both suggest that different SCR reaction pathways might exist on these two catalysts and that NO+ could be an important reaction intermediate for Cu-CHA. Detailed IR studies with various isotopically labeled gas mixtures of (NO + O-2), ((NO)-N-15+ O-2), (NO + O-18(2)) and ((NO)-N-15-O-18+ O-2) were conducted to understand the origin of the surface adsorption complexes on Cu-CHA. Formation of NO+ was not the consequence of a simple charge transfer reaction, NO+ Cu2+= NO+ + Cu+. Instead, O-2 was found to be essential in changing the oxidation state of N from + 2 to + 3 although it did not participate in new NeO bond formation. The majority of the adsorbed NO+ maintained its isotopic origin of the feed gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available