4.3 Article

Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1277-1285

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1107-z

Keywords

Comprehensive cancer control; Cancer survivorship; Health promotion; Public health

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center [5U55DP003054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeAs of 2016, an estimated 15.5million cancer survivors were living in the United States and the number of cancer survivors is expected to increase to 20.3million by 2026. Numerous clinical studies have shown that comorbidities, such as obesity and diabetes, and unhealthy lifestyle choices, such as physical inactivity and heavy smoking, negatively influence overall quality of life and long-term survival of cancer survivors. Accordingly, survivorship programs seek to focus on overall wellness, including symptom management, monitoring for late effects of treatment, monitoring for recurrence, helping patients adapt healthy behaviors, and quality of life. This paper provides a broad overview of public health efforts to address the needs of cancer survivors.MethodsTo describe a range of examples of survivorship initiatives in comprehensive cancer control, we analyzed documents from comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions and solicited detailed examples from several national partners.ResultsComprehensive cancer control programs, coalitions, and partners are undertaking myriad initiatives to address cancer survivorship and building upon evidence-based interventions to promote healthy behaviors for cancer survivors across the country.ConclusionA coordinated public health approach to caring for the growing population of cancer survivors can help address the long-term physical, psychosocial, and economic effects of cancer treatment on cancer survivors and their families.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available