4.4 Article

Reduction of Hip and Other Fractures in Patients Receiving Teriparatide in Real-World Clinical Practice: Integrated Analysis of Four Prospective Observational Studies

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 193-200

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-018-0485-2

Keywords

Fracture; Anabolic; Teriparatide; Observational study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phase 3 teriparatide Fracture Prevention Trial showed significant reductions in vertebral (VF) and nonvertebral (NVF) fractures; however, patient exposure was insufficient for full analysis of low-incidence fractures, including hip. We assessed fracture results in pooled data from four prospective, observational teriparatide studies. Ambulatory women and men with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide 20 mu g/day for up to 24months per routine clinical practice. Fracture rates were compared between 6-month periods, using 0 to 6months of treatment as the reference period. Analyses used a piecewise exponential model for first fracture. Hip, NVF, clinical VF (CVF), any clinical, and wrist fractures were assessed. For 8828 patients analyzed, mean age was 71 years; mean (SD) treatment duration was 17.4 (8.6) months. The rate of hip fracture decreased significantly for the >12 to 18-month (-47.7%) and >18-month periods (-85.2%) versus the first 6months of therapy, and for the >18 versus the >6 to 12-month period. NVF, CVF, and all clinical fractures were all significantly decreased in each post-reference period, with maximum decreases (>18-month period) of 52.7%, 69.4%, and 61.2%, respectively, versus 0 to 6months. No significant reduction was seen for rates of wrist fracture. Teriparatide treatment was associated with statistically significant decreases in hip fracture rate, particularly for >18months of treatment, and in NVF, CVF, and all clinical fracture rate in real-world patients. These results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of the source studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available