4.7 Article

Early immune modulation by single-agent trastuzumab as a marker of trastuzumab benefit

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 119, Issue 12, Pages 1487-1494

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0318-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [15359]
  2. Societa Italiana di Cancerologia
  3. Fondazione Pezcoller

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Optimising the selection of HER2-targeted regimens by identifying subsets of HER2-positive breast cancer ( BC) patients who need more or less therapy remains challenging. We analysed BC samples before and after treatment with 1 cycle of trastuzumab according to the response to trastuzumab. METHODS: Gene expression profiles of pre- and post-treatment tumour samples from 17 HER2-positive BC patients were analysed on the Illumina platform. Tumour-associated immune pathways and blood counts were analysed with regard to the response to trastuzumab. HER2-positive murine models with differential responses to trastuzumab were used to reproduce and better characterise these data. RESULTS: Patients who responded to single-agent trastuzumab had basal tumour biopsies that were enriched in immune pathways, particularly the MHC-II metagene. One cycle of trastuzumab modulated the expression levels of MHC-II genes, which increased in patients who had a complete response on treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Trastuzumab increased the MHC-II-positive cell population, primarily macrophages, only in the tumour microenvironment of responsive mice. In patients who benefited from complete trastuzumab therapy and in mice that harboured responsive tumours circulating neutrophil levels declined, but this cell subset rose in nonresponsive tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Short treatment with trastuzumab induces local and systemic immunomodulation that is associated with clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available