4.6 Article

Lifestyle risk indices in adolescence and their relationships to adolescent disease burden: findings from an Australian national survey

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6396-y

Keywords

Adolescence; Lifestyle risk factors; Burden of disease

Funding

  1. Australian Rotary Health Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe current study investigates the extent to which an adolescent-specific lifestyle risk factor index predicts indicators of the leading causes of adolescent morbidity and mortality.MethodsData came from 13 to 17year-old respondents from the 2013-2014 nationally representative Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (n=2314). Indicators of adolescent disease burden included Major Depressive Disorder, psychological distress, self-harm and suicide attempt. Risk factors included risky alcohol use, drug use, unprotected sex, smoking, BMI and sleep duration. The extent to which these risk factors co-occurred were investigated using tetrachoric correlations. Several risk indices were then constructed based on these risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves determined the precision with which these indices predicted the leading causes of adolescent disease burden.ResultsRisky alcohol use, drug use, smoking, unprotected sex, and sleep were all highly clustered lifestyle risk factors, whereas BMI was not. A risk index comprising risky alcohol use, drug use, unprotected sex and sleep duration predicted the disease burden outcomes with the greatest precision. 31.9% of the sample reported one or more of these behaviours.ConclusionsThis lifestyle risk factor index represents a useful summary metric in the context of adolescent health promotion and non-communicable disease prevention. Lifestyle risk factors were found to cluster in adolescence, supporting the implementation of multiple health behaviour change interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available