4.7 Article

Salmonella-induced thrombi in mice develop asynchronously in the spleen and liver and are not effective bacterial traps

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 133, Issue 6, Pages 600-604

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-867267

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/N023706/1]
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/18/30563]
  3. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT)-Mexico overseas postdoctoral fellowship [CVU 332390]
  4. MRC [MR/N023706/1, MR/N027027/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thrombosis is a frequent, life-threatening complication of systemic infection associated with multiple organ damage. We have previously described a novel mechanism of inflammation-driven thrombosis induced by Salmonella Typhimurium infection of mice. Thrombosis in the liver develops 7 days after infection, persisting after the infection resolves, and is monocytic cell dependent. Unexpectedly, thrombosis was not prominent in the spleen at this time, despite carrying a similar bacterial burden as the liver. In this study, we show that thrombosis does occur in the spleen but with strikingly accelerated kinetics compared with the liver, being evident by 24 hours and resolving rapidly thereafter. The distinct kinetics of thrombosis and bacterial burden provides a test of the hypothesis that thrombi form in healthy vessels to trap or remove bacteria from the circulation, often termed immunothrombosis. Remarkably, despite bacteria being detected throughout infected spleens and livers in the early days of infection, immunohistological analysis of tissue sections show that thrombi contain very low numbers of bacteria. In contrast, bacteria are present throughout platelet aggregates induced by Salmonella in vitro. Therefore, we show that thrombosis develops with organ-specific kinetics and challenge the universality of immunothrombosis as a mechanism to capture bacteria in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available