4.6 Article

What outcomes should researchers select, collect and report in pre-eclampsia research? A qualitative study exploring the views of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15616

Keywords

Core outcome sets; in-depth patient interviews; outcomes; pre-eclampsia; qualitative research

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2014-07-051]
  2. National Institute for Health Research Professorship [NIHR-RP-R2-12-015]
  3. National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To identify outcomes relevant to women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. Design Qualitative interview study. Setting A national study conducted in the United Kingdom. Sample Purposive sample of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. Methods Thematic analysis of qualitative interview transcripts. Results Thirty women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified 71 different treatment outcomes. Fifty-nine of these had been previously reported by pre-eclampsia trials. Outcomes related to maternal and neonatal morbidity, commonly reported by pre-eclampsia trials, were frequently discussed by women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia. Twelve outcomes had not been previously reported by pre-eclampsia trials. When compared with published research, it was evident that the outlook of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia was broader. They considered pre-eclampsia in relation to the 'whole' person and attached special significance to outcomes relating to emotional wellbeing and the future health, development and wellbeing of their offspring. Conclusions Selecting, collecting and reporting outcomes relevant to women with pre-eclampsia should ensure that future pre-eclampsia research has the necessary reach and relevance to inform clinical practice. Future core outcome set development studies should use qualitative research methods to ensure that the long list of potential core outcomes holds relevance to patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available