4.6 Article

Systematic identification of Celastrol-binding proteins reveals that Shoc2 is inhibited by Celastrol

Journal

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20181233

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81573111, 81774079, 81703267]
  2. Natural Science Fund of Shanghai [16ZR1444500]
  3. Plan of the Innovation Action of Shanghai Science and Technology [14160904600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer. Celastrol exhibits anti-tumor activities in a variety of cancers. However, the effect of Celastrol on human CRC and the underlying mechanisms still need to be elucidated. The present study aimed to use in vitro and in vivo methods to clarify the anti-tumor effect of Celastrol and use protein microarrays to explore its mechanisms. We demonstrated that Celastrol effectively inhibited SW480 CRC cell proliferation. Two weeks of Celastrol gavage significantly inhibited the growth of xenografts in nude mice. A total of 69 candidate proteins were identified in the protein microarray experiment, including the most highly enriched protein Shoc2, which is a scaffold protein that modulates cell motility and metastasis through the ERK pathway. Celastrol significantly inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cell lines and xenograft tumors. Down-regulation of Shoc2 expression using Shoc2 siRNA also inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, down-regulation of Shoc2 expression also significantly inhibited proliferation, colony formation, and migration functions of tumor cells. In addition, the LD0 of Celastrol by gavage is equal or more than 80 mg/kg in C57 male mice. In summary, we unraveled the anti-CRC function of Celastrol and confirmed for the first time that it inhibited the ERK1/2 pathway through binding to Shoc2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available