4.7 Article

Building energy savings: Analysis of research trends based on text mining

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 398-410

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.008

Keywords

Building energy saving; Building energy efficiency; Text mining; Data mining; Topic modeling

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Government Basic Research Foundation for Free exploration [JCYJ20170818141151733]
  2. Social Science Research Support Grant [17QNFC34]
  3. Shenzhen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Building energy saving has become the top concern in achieving global sustainability. In the past decades, massive amounts of academic articles and engineering reports have been published, focusing on the energy conservation throughout the whole building life-cycle. From a macroscopic perspective, these articles provide a comprehensive description on the development of building energy saving measures and technologies. The knowledge discovered from such text data can be used to facilitate the decision-making for researchers and policymakers. Conventional approaches are neither effective nor efficient in analyzing massive text data. As a solution, this study proposes a text mining-based methodology to gain insights from relevant literature on building energy saving. In total, 1600 articles were collected and analyzed at different stages according to important timestamps identified. Various text mining techniques were adopted to identify and describe the research trends. The results present clear differences in research focuses at different stages. An emerging research trend has been identified in the building field, which is related to green buildings, intelligent buildings and low-carbon buildings. The methodology developed in this study can be used as a prototype to enable semi-automated knowledge discovery from massive text data in the building field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available