4.7 Article

Finite-time stability and settling-time estimation of nonlinear impulsive systems

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 361-368

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.10.024

Keywords

Finite-time stability; Settling-time; Nonlinear impulsive systems; Lyapunov theorems; Time delay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673247, 61833005]
  2. Research Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and Excellent Young Scholars of Shandong Province, China [JQ201719, ZR2016JL024]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Networked Collective Intelligence [BM2017002]
  4. Research grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 11200717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the problem of finite-time stability (FTS) for nonlinear impulsive systems. Based on impulsive control theory, several Lyapunov-based FTS theorems involving stabilizing impulses and destabilizing impulses are established, respectively. Our proposed results provide sufficient conditions for estimating the settling-time with respect to suitable classes of impulse time sequences. It is shown that the settling-time of nonlinear impulsive systems depends not only on the initial state but also on the impulse effect. As compared with the case without using stabilizing impulses, a smaller bound of setting time can be derived when a FTS system is subject to stabilizing impulses. Conversely, a larger bound of settling-time can be derived when the FTS system is subject to destabilizing impulses, as compared with the case without using destabilizing impulses. As a special case, we extend the ideas to nonlinear impulsive delay systems and derive some delay-independent PIS results. Examples and their simulations are given to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed results. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.y

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available