4.6 Article

Machine Learning and Deep Learning frameworks and libraries for large-scale data mining: a survey

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 77-124

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-018-09679-z

Keywords

Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Large-scale data mining; Artificial Intelligence software; Parallel processing; Intensive computing; Graphics processing unit (GPU)

Funding

  1. project DEEP-HybridDataCloud Designing and Enabling E-infrastructures for intensive Processing in a Hybrid DataCloud from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [777435]
  2. Project VEGA Methods and algorithms for the semantic processing of Big Data in distributed computing environment [2/0167/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combined impact of new computing resources and techniques with an increasing avalanche of large datasets, is transforming many research areas and may lead to technological breakthroughs that can be used by billions of people. In the recent years, Machine Learning and especially its subfield Deep Learning have seen impressive advances. Techniques developed within these two fields are now able to analyze and learn from huge amounts of real world examples in a disparate formats. While the number of Machine Learning algorithms is extensive and growing, their implementations through frameworks and libraries is also extensive and growing too. The software development in this field is fast paced with a large number of open-source software coming from the academy, industry, start-ups or wider open-source communities. This survey presents a recent time-slide comprehensive overview with comparisons as well as trends in development and usage of cutting-edge Artificial Intelligence software. It also provides an overview of massive parallelism support that is capable of scaling computation effectively and efficiently in the era of Big Data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available