4.7 Review

New technologies provide more metabolic engineering strategies for bioethanol production in Zymomonas mobilis

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages 2087-2099

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09620-6

Keywords

Bioethanol; Metabolic engineering; Zymomonas mobilis; Lignocellulosic hydrolysates; Inhibitor

Funding

  1. Key Project of Natural Science of the Education Department of Henan Province, China [17A180028]
  2. Youth Foundation of Henan Normal University [2015QK18]
  3. National Research project Cultivation Foundation of Henan Normal University [2017PL08]
  4. Doctoral Scientific Research Start-up Foundation of Henan Normal University [5101049170167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioethanol has been considered as a potentially renewable energy source, and metabolic engineering plays an important role in the production of biofuels. As an efficient ethanol-producing bacterium, Zymomonas mobilis has garnered special attention due to its high sugar uptake, ethanol yield, and tolerance. Different metabolic engineering strategies have been used to establish new metabolic pathways for Z. mobilis to broaden its substrate range, remove competing pathways, and enhance its tolerance to ethanol and lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors. Recent advances in omics technology, computational modeling and simulation, system biology, and synthetic biology contribute to the efficient re-design and manipulation of microbes via metabolic engineering at the whole-cell level. In this review, we summarize the progress of some new technologies used for metabolic engineering to improve bioethanol production and tolerance in Z. mobilis. Some successful examples of metabolic engineering used to develop strains for ethanol production are described in detail. Lastly, some important strategies for future metabolic engineering efforts are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available