4.7 Article

Sensitivity measurement of a laboratory standard microphone by measuring the diaphragm vibration

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 38-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.08.025

Keywords

Microphone sensitivity; Laboratory standard microphone; Volume velocity

Categories

Funding

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program [KMI2018-02310]
  2. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under KRISS Grant [18011033]
  3. Korea Meteorological Institute (KMI) [KMI2018-02310] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a method to determine the sensitivity of a laboratory standard microphone, the reciprocity method is employed as an international standard (IEC61094-2). This method is highly reliable and achieves high precision. However, three microphones are essentially required for this method. This procedure is complicated and takes a long time due to many combinations of microphone pairs and couplers. To overcome these difficulties, a novel method based on the measurement of vibration on the surface of a microphone using a laser Doppler vibrometer is proposed. It aims to obtain the sensitivity of a laboratory standard microphone. To this end, the relationship between the surface velocity of the diaphragm centre and acoustic volume velocity induced by the vibration of the diaphragm surface is investigated, and an empirical model is developed by measuring the distribution of the surface velocity. This paper used an empirical model of a 1-in. laboratory standard microphone estimated with 6 samples. The estimated sensitivity using this model has a difference of about 0.1 dB from the results of the reciprocity method applied to samples not used for estimating the empirical model. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available