4.3 Article

Metabolomics-based Discovery of Serum Biomarkers to Predict the Side-effects of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 519-526

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13143

Keywords

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; metabolomics; biomarker; side-effect; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-flurouracil; cisplatin

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16H05227]
  2. AMED-CREST by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [18gm0710013h0005]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05227] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has side-effects that adversely affect patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify serum metabolite biomarkers that might be used to predict the side-effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and Methods: Metabolomic analysis of serum samples from 26 patients with ESCC that were collected before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was performed. The metabolites associated with hematological toxicity or nephrotoxicity were evaluated. Results: Serum levels of glutaric acid, glucuronic acid, and cystine were significantly higher in hematological toxicity, and phosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines exhibited a tendency to be higher in those with hematological toxicity. The serum level of pyruvic acid was significantly lower in nephrotoxicity, and lysophosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylethanolamines tended to be lower in those with nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: Our study found that serum levels of some metabolites differed significantly between patients with and without hematological or renal side-effects. These metabolites may be useful biomarkers for predicting hematological toxicity or nephrotoxicity after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for ESCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available