4.3 Article

Anti-Xa Oral Anticoagulant Plasma Concentration Assay in Real Life: Rivaroxaban and Apixaban Quantification in Emergency With LMWH Calibrator

Journal

ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 341-347

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1060028018811657

Keywords

factor Xa inhibitors; bleeding; drug screening; correlation between anticoagulant measurement; laboratory testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Oral anti-Xa inhibitors have demonstrated noninferiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and recurrent venous thromboembolism. They are associated with a decrease in major bleeding. In contrast with VKA, no coagulation monitoring is required. However, in clinical practice, determination of drug concentration is sometimes necessary. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) calibrated anti-Xa assay for the quantification of rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentration in emergency. Methods: The anti-Xa plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and apixaban were measured in emergency in 210 patients using STA anti-Xa liquid assay. For each plasma concentration <150 ng/mL of rivaroxaban or apixaban, an anti-Xa assay calibrated with LMWH was performed. Results: We demonstrated a significant correlation between LMWH anti-Xa activity and rivaroxaban (R-2 = 0.947) or apixaban (R-2 = 0.959) concentration and a significant correlation between rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentration (R-2 = 0.972). A LMWH anti-Xa activity 30 ng/mL and indicate the feasibility of invasive procedure. Conclusion and Relevance: In the absence of a specific test, LMWH-calibrated anti-Xa assay could be used to determine the presence and evaluate the plasma concentration of oral anti-Xa inhibitors. However, these initial findings require confirmation using other chromogenic calibrated oral anti-Xa assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available