4.4 Article

Association of Parity in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Journal

ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1035-1041

Publisher

MEXICAN ASSOC HEPATOLOGY
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7204

Keywords

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Pregnancy; Infertility; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Insulin resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction and aim. The impact of type of liver disease on parity rates hasn't been described. Our aim was to assess the parity rates among women with CLD. Material and methods. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III (1988-1994) data were used to identify adult female participants with a diagnosis of CLD. Participants were asked about their reproductive health status. Parity was defined as having at least one live birth. Hepatic ultrasound, serologic, medical examination and clinical data were available to determine the presence and type of CLD. Body mass index (kg/m(2)) was divided into 3 categories (<30; 30-35; 36+). Results. A total of 3,502 (865 NAFLD, 737 other CLD, 1,901 control) subjects were included. Patients with NAFLD were more likely to have at least one live birth than patients with other CLD and controls (77% in NAFLD vs. 72% in controls). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of CLD other than NAFLD (OR: 0.46 [95% CI, 0.34-0.63]) and having a college or higher degree (OR: 0.48 [95% CI, 0.34-0.68]) were negatively associated while having low income (OR: 11.06 [95% CI, 6.86-17.82]) and being African American (OR: 3.93 [95% CI, 2.59-5.98]) were positively associated with having at least one live birth. Conclusions. This study revealed that patients with CLD other than NAFLD were less likely to have at least one live birth. NAFLD and obesity were associated with higher rates of live births which can potentially be explained by weight gain post live birth leading to obesity and its associated-NAFLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available