4.4 Article

Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation

Journal

ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 55-61

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/asj.13129

Keywords

CRISPR/Cas9; genome editing; in vitro fertilization; pig zygote; zygote electroporation

Funding

  1. Funds for the Development of Human Resources in Science and Technology
  2. Home for Innovative Researchers and Academic Knowledge Users (HIRAKU)
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17H03938, JP17K19325]
  4. SATREPS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we established the GEEP (gene editing by electroporation of Cas9 protein) method, in which the CRISPR/Cas9 system, consisting of a Cas9 protein and single guide RNA (sgRNA), is introduced into pig zygotes by electroporation and thus induces highly efficient targeted gene disruption. In this study, we examined the effects of sgRNA on the blastocyst formation of porcine embryos and evaluated their genome-editing efficiency. To produce an animal model for diabetes, we targeted PDX-1 (pancreas duodenum homeobox 1), a gene that is crucial for pancreas development during the fetal period and whose monoallelic disruption impairs insulin secretion. First, Cas9 protein with different sgRNAs that targeted distinct sites in the PDX-1 exon 1 was introduced into in vitro-fertilized zygotes by the GEEP method. Of the six sgRNAs tested, three sgRNAs (sgRNA1, 2, and 3) successfully modified PDX-1 gene. The blastocyst formation rate of zygotes edited with sgRNA3 was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of control zygotes without the electroporation treatment. Our study indicates that the GEEP method can be successfully used to generate PDX-1 mutant blastocysts, but the development and the efficiency of editing the genome of zygotes may be affected by the sgRNA used for CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available