4.4 Article

Genetics and extinction and the example of Isle Royale wolves

Journal

ANIMAL CONSERVATION
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 302-309

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12479

Keywords

immigration; inbreeding; inbreeding depression; pedigree; runs of homozygosity; SNPs; extinction; Canis lupus

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1453041]
  2. National Institute of Health [R35GM119856]
  3. National Park Service (CESU) [P11AC90808]
  4. National Geographic Society
  5. McIntyre-Stennis Grant (USDA-Nifa) [1004363]
  6. Robbins Chair in Sustainable Management of the Environment
  7. NIFA [1004363, 811518] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic factors have long been a concern in the extinction and viability of species with the short-term effects focusing on inbreeding depression. Genetic rescue has been suggested as a means to overcome the detrimental effects of inbreeding depression. However, it has been difficult to document the genetic dynamics over time of genetic rescue, inbreeding depression and other genetic relationships in endangered species. We show here using a detailed pedigree and genomic data that genetic rescue in the gray wolf Canis lupus population on Isle Royale had only a temporary positive effect reducing inbreeding depression and then the genetic changes from the immigration event resulted in a population decline and now imminent extinction of the population. Examining the genetic details of this situation shows how genetic dynamics after the initial positive effects of genetic rescue have passed can return a small population to a path toward extinction. Thus, the successful conservation of critically small populations would likely depend on alleviating the cause of having become critically small, such as habitat restoration, or periodic re-application of genetic rescue in a manner that does not result in negative genetic dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available