4.2 Article

Characteristics of Muscle Fiber-Type Distribution in Moles

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ar.24008

Keywords

Soricomorpha; muscle fiber type; MHC isoform; immunohistochemistry; SDS-PAGE

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [15K12681]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K12681] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moles are a strictly fossorial Soricomorpha species and possess a suite of specialized adaptations to subterranean life. However, the contractile function of skeletal muscles in moles remains unclear. We compared muscle fiber-type distribution in two mole species (the large Japanese mole and lesser Japanese mole) with that in four other Soricomorpha species that are semi-fossorial, terrestrial, or semi-aquatic (the Japanese shrew-mole, house shrew, Japanese white-toothed shrew, and Japanese water shrew). For a single species, the fiber-type distribution in up to 38 muscles was assessed using immunohistochemical staining and/or gel electrophoresis. We found that slow and fatigue-resistant Type I fibers were absent in almost all muscles of all species studied. Although, the two methods of determining the fiber type did not give identical results, they both revealed that fast Type IIb fibers were absent in mole muscles. The fiber-type distribution was similar among different anatomical regions in the moles. This study demonstrated that the skeletal muscles of moles have a homogenous fiber-type distribution compared with that in Soricomorpha species that are not strictly fossorial. Mole muscles are composed of Type IIa fibers alone or a combination of Type IIa and relatively fast Type IIx fibers. The homogenous fiber-type distribution in mole muscles may be an adaptation to structurally simple subterranean environments, where there is no need to support body weight with the limbs, or to move at high speeds to pursue prey or to escape from predators. Anat Rec, 302:1010-1023, 2019. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available