4.8 Article

Photoelectrochemical-Chemical-Chemical Redox Cycling for Advanced Signal Amplification: Proof-of-Concept Toward Ultrasensitive Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 90, Issue 21, Pages 12347-12351

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03798

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675136, 21675080, 21874115]
  2. Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent of Henan Province [2017JR0016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170073]
  4. Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [18HASTIT003]
  5. Funding Scheme for the Young Backbone Teachers of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province [2016GGJS-097]
  6. Nanhu Young Scholar Supporting Program of XYNU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signal amplification is essential for ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical (PEC) bioanalysis. Exploration of the facile and efficient route for multiple signal amplification is highly appealing. Herein, we present the concept of photoelectrochemical-chemical-chemical (PECCC) redox cycling as an advanced signal amplification route and a proof-of-concept toward ultrasensitive PEC bioanalysis. The system operated upon the bridging between the enzymatic generation of signaling species ascorbic acid (AA) from a sandwich immunoassay and the PECCC redox cycling among the ferrocenecarboxylic acid as redox mediator, the AA, and the tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine as reducing agent at the Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 photoelectrode. Exemplified by myoglobin (Myo) as target, the proposed system achieved efficient regeneration of AA and thus signal amplification toward the ultrasensitive split-type PEC immunoassay. This work first exploited the PECCC redox cycling, and we believe it will attract more interest in the research of PEC bioassays on the basis of advanced redox cycling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available